Category Archives: Thoughts About God

Now We Can See

“Now we can see that you know all things and that you do not even need to have anyone ask you questions. This makes us believe that you came from God.” (v. 30).

I’d like to go back to the question asked at the end of our first session in this topic (See Post, The 12 Finally Got It).

I’ve often wondered what was it about this evening’s conversation that helped the disciples ‘get it’?  Were they listening to Jesus in a different way?  Or, is it possible they could have heard him say something different?  Did Jesus say something he hadn’t said before; something that, literally, opened their ears of their heart?

In an earlier session, we considered that the disciples may have been guilty of misapplying their belief in Jesus.  The verse we’re focusing on now contains a declaration that I’ve always interpreted as their belief that Jesus was the Son of God.  But what if their statement of belief was something different….?  Or, more to the heart of my question, what if their statement of belief included something else?

Consider carefully what you hear…

In the earlier part of this passage Jesus told the disciples that soon would come a day when they would no longer ask him anything and the Father will give them whatever they ask in Jesus’ name (Jn 16.23).

Is it possible this was the statement that triggered the disciples’ belief?

Consider carefully what you hear…

Jesus continued by telling them it wouldn’t be long before he would no longer speak in figures of speech, but would tell them plainly about his Father (v. 25).  He then tells them they will ask in his name, and goes on to tell them the Father loves them because they loved Jesus and believed he came from God (v. 27).  At this point in the text is when the disciples excitedly relay their belief.

“Now we can see that you know all things and that you do not even need to have anyone ask you questions. This makes us believe that you came from God.” (v. 30).

They could finally hear it clearly.  Jesus spoke in simple, clear, plain terms; and not in figures of speech.  They do not need to ask Jesus any questions – they can go directly to the Father.

Consider carefully what you hear….

I always wondered why, in verse 30, the disciples said Jesus didn’t need people to ask him questions.  I always thought this was some kind of recognition that Jesus knows all things and, because he knows, he shouldn’t be subjected to the constant questioning of those who reject him and attempt to trap him.  This is a true statement; but I’m no longer as sure this is the whole of what the disciples were declaring in this verse.

“In that day you will no longer ask me anything…my Father will give you whatever you ask in my name.”         “…you do not even need to have anyone ask you any questions.”

What if the disciples grasped, at the same time, Jesus’ nature as the Son of God and their nature as children of God?  What if this exclamation is a result of them realising their own relationship with the Father?  …of realising their role?  And, in this moment, they have caught a glimpse of the magnitudinous implications of WHO the Father is, WHO Jesus is and who they are in this relationship?

Consider carefully what you hear….

 

 

 

Jesus Gave the Words

Another aspect of this story is the way Jesus, when talking with the Father, described his interaction with the disciples.  He said, “I Gave them the words you gave me…”.

The phrase intrigues me.  Why did Jesus say it this way?  Why didn’t he say ‘I told them what you told me to say’…?  Or, ‘I taught them as you instructed’…?  Even if he had said, ‘I passed on what you told me to say’, it would have sounded …. well, it would have sounded like the way we talk today.  As it is, Jesus’ way of describing it, sounds very literal; very transactional.  Father, you gave me the words to say and I gave them to the guys.

We know from other places in Scripture that Jesus only spoke what he heard from the Father (Jn 5.19).  He repeatedly told people that what he taught was not his teaching, but was that of the Father (Jn 7.16).  So, I’m not surprised that in this story Jesus would confirm the words he spoke were words he heard from the Father.  I’m just a little surprised at the way he phrased how this speaking took place.

“I gave them the words you gave me and they received them…”.

The Greek for ‘words’ used here is rhema, which means that which is spoken, by a living voice; a declaration of one’s mind put into words. *  In the context, then, God manifested his mind through his words spoken to Jesus who, in turn, gave them to the disciples.  But, I am extremely curious about the way Jesus speaks about the words.  To say it the way he did implies that the words from God are substance, material or tangible.

As we have seen in previous sessions, the words spoken by God contain, in their very essence, Life and Spirit (see post).  So, when the disciples heard the words spoken by Jesus, which were originally given by the Father, the disciples received not only the content of the words, but a portion of God himself – a portion of his Life and Spirit.

But the disciples did not merely hear the words spoken by Jesus.  The Bible says they received; they accepted; they took possession of the words given to them.  The words weren’t merely spoken concepts that passed into their consciousness through their physical ears; the words were a substance which the disciples actively grasped.  In doing so they received the life and spirit the words contained.  To put it in the way we’ve been discussing: they recognised something tangible within their spirit and responded by receiving the message and combining faith to what they heard.

Consider carefully what you hear…. Consider carefully how you listen…

Additionally, this passage says that they received the words and knew with certainty.  On this point, I would ask you to consider your own process of hearing and knowing.  Think back to a time when you heard/felt/sensed God speak.  In these moments we usually experience a deep confidence, an inner peace, an assurance that we just encountered the Living God.  Even if this experience is momentary, if we allow ourselves to embrace what we heard from Him, it enhances our understanding of WHO he is.  If we were to analyse that moment, we would likely speak with confidence of who God is and how this newly realised truth is crucial to life.

This is, I think, what happened with the disciples that evening.  They heard an eternal truth from Jesus, recognised the Life and Spirit within that truth and responded, in faith, by receiving this truth.  Through taking possession of the truth, it was as though a seed was implanted into their spirit and Jesus knew this was all that was needed at this point.  The soil of their heart was ready and the seed carried a life of its own.

  • The Father gave the words to Jesus.
  • Jesus gave the words to the disciples.
  • The disciples received the words (belief)
  • Receiving the words led them to know with certainty.

Later would come the lessons of learning how integrate this truth into their circumstances and allowing it to alter their way of perceiving themselves and the world around them.

 

* TDNT Vol 4: 69,505

 

 

They Believed with Certainty

Our last session ended with a question about what the disciples may have heard from Jesus that was different from all the other times Jesus spoke to them.  I’m really excited to investigate that question, but before we do, I think it’s important to look further at Jesus’ response to the disciples’ declaration of belief.

Jesus affirmed their belief.  “You believe at last!”  Other English versions translate this as a question. “Now, do you believe?” (RSV).  If we were to only read the versions which translate this in the form of a question, it could be possible to read the question with a negative connotation.  But, rather than the question being interpreted negatively, is it possible Jesus would have asked the question approving tone….  “Now-w-w-w, do you get it?”

One aspect of the written record I find somewhat striking is that Jesus doesn’t spend much time on their newly realised belief.  He doesn’t spend time praising them.  He doesn’t congratulate them.  The good teacher simply acknowledges that the students finally ‘got it’ and they’re now ready for the next lesson.  You believe?  Good.  Now you need to understand that you’re going to scatter and leave me.  You believe; but very soon you’re going to make decisions as though you don’t believe.

So much for relishing their newly obtained clarity!!  I imagine they very quickly became a bit more confused.  Yet – lest my sarcasm detract from their experience – it is evident that they truly had come to a place of belief, or Jesus would not have acknowledged it the way he did.

In fact, a few verses later when Jesus prayed to the Father he said, in reference to the disciples, “For I gave them the words you gave me and they accepted them.  They knew with certainty that I came from you, and they believed that you sent me.” (Jn 17.8)

Did you hear what he said?!  Jesus said the disciples knew with certainty that Jesus came from God.  The RSV puts it like this: “they know in truth that I came from you”.  After three years of not getting it; after all the misunderstood statements; after all the self-promoting behaviours; Jesus says the disciples got it with certainty.

With all the questions they had over the three years – and with the questions they had even after this point – Jesus’ statement to the Father seems to give them more credit than the disciples deserve.  After all, their very next lesson was that they would soon act as though they didn’t really believe him.  Soon after this night, on the day Jesus ascends to the Father, some of the disciples were still incorrectly applying the meaning of Jesus’ purpose and asked him, “Now are you going to establish the Kingdom in Israel?” (Acts 1.6).  So, how much belief did their expression of belief really carry?

The fact that the disciples didn’t really get the full meaning of His role and personhood didn’t appear to bother Jesus.  He seemed convinced that their belief – small though it may have been – gave them the essentials.

This is one of the most comforting attributes of God.  He is so generous that he takes even a partial understanding and considers it great.  Jesus isn’t expecting the disciples, or us, to have everything all figured out.  It reminds me of what Jesus said about faith the size of a mustard seed.  It also helps me understand that the dad who wanted his son healed and cried out, “I believe, help me overcome my unbelief!”, actually contained more belief than what he is generally given credit for (see Mk 9.17-27).

I find it amazing, that Jesus would give the disciples so much credit.  I also find it comforting, that he would extend them so much grace.  But, of course, that is WHO he is.

He is good, He is gentle and He is humble.  He understood that the disciples only needed to catch a glimpse of the Truth for the seed of truth to be firmly planted within the soil of their hearts.  He knew, once they believed, Holy Spirit would continue guiding them into all truth (cf Jn 16.12-14).

 

 

The 12 Finally Got It

In school, I was a good student but I struggled with maths and science classes.  I still remember the feeling of not understanding an algebraic equation; as if I was lost and stumbling around in a dark fog.  It was rare that I caught the concepts the first time.  It was usually the case where, as if from nowhere, the penny would drop and I ‘got it’.  That was a glorious feeling of relief.  Chemistry class, however, was a different experience.  I remember trying to memorise the periodic table and how the different elements worked together but I never understood it.  When the teacher would explain how it worked and my classmates ‘got it’, I sat there confused and lost in a world I did not understand.  I struggled through the year and barely made a passing grade.  One thing was clear after that class, I would not be pursuing a career that involved chemistry.

When I read the stories about the disciples I find myself, on the one hand, being surprised at their inconsistency and, on the other hand, full of empathetic understanding for them.  I sometimes imagine that they, after hearing Jesus explain that he was the Son of God, may have felt a bit like I did in my chemistry class.  We heard the words you just said; we recognise there is a significance in the words; but we simply don’t get it. We’re lost.

The disciples seemed to continually struggle to understand Jesus’ purpose for his life and ministry.  Even after Jesus’ repeated explanations, and their pronouncements of commitment and desire to follow; the twelve seemed to regularly misunderstand, misinterpret and misapply what Jesus was teaching them.

All throughout his ministry Jesus told people that he had come to reveal the Father.  He even told them that he and the Father were one; they were the same (Jn 14.9, see post).  But it wasn’t until the night of his betrayal that the disciples seemed to finally grasp what Jesus had spent so much time trying to make clear to them.

“Now we can see that you know all things and that you do not even need to have anyone ask you questions.  This makes us believe that you came from God.”  (John 16.30; NIV)

You can almost hear the penny drop for them. “Oh-h-h-h… now we get it”.

One of the most intriguing aspects of this enlightened moment, is that Jesus affirms their understanding.  He knew they finally ‘got it’.

You believe at last! (John 16.31; NIV)  

I think back to the story told in John 6 when many of the other followers left Jesus because his teaching was too difficult.  When Jesus asked the twelve if they were going to leave him as well, Peter responded by saying, “Where else would we go, you have the words of eternal life.” (Jn 6.68).  Peter was articulating an understanding that something was happening deep in his soul; but, it would appear, he still had not yet fully grasped the significance of Jesus or his words.

Later, when Jesus asked the disciples who did they think he was, Peter responded, “You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God” (Mt 16.16).  Jesus commended him for being able to hear the revelation from the Father.  Yet, as we know from events that followed, Peter was yet to grow into a full understanding of that revelation.

But the belief expressed by the disciples in John 16.30 is different.  In this passage they all ‘got it’.  This passage is written as a collective declaration of belief attributed to all the disciples.  The penny dropped for them and we can hear their excitement in the way they spoke, “Now we can see that you know all things and you do not even need to have anyone ask you questions…”

I find myself relieved for them; even relieved with them.  The fog that brought confusion has lifted.  No more stumbling and fumbling through the dark.  They can now move more freely, no longer weighed down by their lack of understanding.

We’re looking at this story in the context of our recent discussions about considering carefully what we hear and how we listen.  With that as a background, I can’t help but wonder what was going on within the hearts of the disciples for them to be able to say this?  What did they hear that night that was different from what they had heard the previous three years?  What tangible activity were they perceiving within their hearts?  What did they recognise in Jesus’ words that enabled them to respond with this declaration of belief?

 

 

Re-Learning Belief

Jesus taught that we should consider carefully what we hear.  Then he taught that we need to consider carefully how we listen.  In both instances, Jesus instructed his followers to interact with him in two ways.  First, he had an expectation that his followers would engage with the content, meaning and implication of what he has taught.  Secondly, he had an expectation that his followers would recognise, identify and participate with the variety of communication methods he uses to instruct us.

In taking seriously the instruction to ‘consider carefully how we listen’ it becomes evident there is a wide spectrum on which we might respond to what we’ve heard.  For instance, at one end of the spectrum, we could respond with a confident, matter-of-fact faith that simply acts on the basis that Jesus means what he says (Lk 7.1-10, see post).  At the opposite end of the spectrum would be those who whole-heartedly rejected Jesus and completely disregarded what he said (Jn 11.47-50).  At some point on the spectrum would be the ones who heard his teaching, recognised his truth and responded but, at least for a time, weren’t overt in the way in which they lived out that belief (Jn 19.38, see post).  Most of us would land on the spectrum somewhere between the Centurion and those who tried to figure out how to live what they believed.

One of the things I’m humbled by – and asking Holy Spirit to help me in – is the wide variety of places I land on this spectrum, depending on the heart issue I’m investigating at any given time.  In some areas, I have heard Jesus’ words and find it somewhat easy to respond in a measure of confidence, peace or rest – because I have an assurance of how God has spoken to me or demonstrated himself.  Perhaps it was a past encounter or perhaps it was the clarity in which I heard him; but standing in these places my feet do not easily slip.

However, in other areas where I am learning to apply the lessons we’re discussing, I don’t feel as steady on my feet.  In some of these areas, I find myself unsteady; revisiting previous intentions, listening for wisdom that leads to stability.  Some of these areas, while they are not new, carry what feels like new lessons; as if the practice of considering carefully how I listen brings fresh instructions.  It’s as though, by taking his instruction more seriously the last few years, I’m re-learning how to believe what Jesus taught and thereby, discovering HIM more deeply.

I wish I could say I always live with the faith of the Centurion or the Syrophoenician woman.  But, I often relate with those who presented their need, expressed their confusion or admitted their lack of faith.  In these times, with desire for a deeper experience of what Jesus taught, the following stories help me refocus on the content of Jesus’ message and prompt me to consider more carefully how I listen.

When fear or doubt get in the way of belief:  “Don’t be afraid, just believe….” (Mark 5.36)

When I get frustrated with a lack of breakthrough, healing or change:  “I believe, help me overcome my unbelief… “  (Mark 9.24)

When I feel confused, uncertain, or at a loss for direction: “Don’t let your hearts be troubled.  Believe God, Believe me also”  (Jn 14.1)

When I consider carefully what I hear and how I listen, many Scripture verses take on new meaning.  The freshness of HIS voice peels back the layers of familiarity and invites me into a deeper experience with HIS words.

“I am the Way, the Truth and the Life” (Jn 14.6)

 

I am learning to come to him, listen to what he says and then put his teachings into practice (see post).  I am on a journey of rediscovering the practice of trust, of faith, of belief.

Response of Faith

As we  learn to carefully consider what we hear, it may benefit us to look at examples of others.  We previously discussed how the writer of Hebrews painted a picture of those who did not consider what they had heard as having value and, therefore, did not combine it with faith.  By way of contrast, it will now be worth exploring examples of those who demonstrated a response of faith.

The New Testament is full of stories of people who came to Jesus for a healing or a miracle, which he provided for them.  But there are a few written accounts that absolutely amaze me.  These are situations in which Jesus himself said that the people would receive what they requested because of their faith.  Did you hear that?  In these situations the Bible doesn’t say, “Jesus had compassion on him and healed him.”  It says that in other places.  It doesn’t say, “Go and be healed of your disease”.  Again, that is in other passages.  No, in the situations mentioned below Jesus told each of the people involved it was THEIR FAITH that brought about the result they were seeking.

  • Woman with Bleeding (Mt 9.20-22; Mk 5.24-34)
  • Roman Centurion (Mt 8.5-10; Lk 7.1-10)
  • Syrophoenician Woman (Mt 15.21-28; Mk 7.24-30)

I have been spending a lot of time reading these stories and asking Holy Spirit to reveal what he was stirring in each person that prompted them to go to Jesus the way they did.  While each situation was different and each need was unique there are few things they all have in common.

Each request broke a social/cultural norm.  Each person had to step over a cultural boundary in making their request of Jesus.  But this boundary was not a small risk; they were putting everything on the line.  Imagine, the implications they faced!!  Because they received what they requested I would guess there were no negative social consequences – or, if there were, the people certainly didn’t care any longer.  But try putting yourself into their situation and consider the thought process they went through before they took the risk.

The woman with bleeding was considered unclean and, therefore, not allowed to be among a crowd in case she were to make everyone else ‘unclean’.   In addition, devout men would have gone to great lengths not to bump into a woman to prevent becoming accidentally unclean. By forcing her way through a crowd to touch Jesus, this woman crossed several social boundaries.

The Roman Centurion faced great risk to his career and his ability to maintain authority over his subordinates.  Ironically, this is the very understanding on which he based his request to Jesus.

The Syrophoenician Woman was a Gentile and, therefore, not considered part of God’s people; so not entitled to request anything of Jesus.  Further, as a Gentile, she would not have been allowed to enter the home of a Law-abiding Jewish person.  And, as a woman she was not considered of high enough standing for a Rabbi to speak with her.

Another thing they all have in common is, after the initial request, each person had a follow-up response to Jesus.  While this may not sound like a big step, it was.  Jesus was considered a Rabbi and the fact that so many people followed him and wanted to see him, his time was precious.  We can glean from the Gospel writers that Jesus was quick in his decision-making, direct with his questions and not overly concerned about pleasing everyone.  If someone had any hesitation in coming to him, a quick decision, a seemingly off-putting comment or a challenging question could have caused a person to second-guess their request.  But none of these people faltered under Jesus’ initial response.  They each responded to Jesus in a way that demonstrated to him they were operating in faith.

The way my mind works, it’s at this point I ask myself, what was going on in Jesus’ heart and his interactions with the Father as he listened to the person?  What language of the Spirit did he recognise from each person?  How did he move from agreeing to go to the Centurion’s house, to simply stating the man’s faith had granted him the request?   What was Jesus listening for when he reminded the woman that children must eat before the pets?  How did her response confirm that her heart was full of belief that he would grant her request?  And, how did his awareness of power leaving his body connect with the woman’s faith that pulled on that power?

I’m fascinated with all these stories and the way in which they can help us consider carefully how we listen.  Before these people approached Jesus they recognised something in what they heard about him or from his teaching.  And their response to what they heard, while it took great personal risk, demonstrated a belief in HIM that was greater than their obedience to cultural boundaries and understanding of personal circumstances.

Music in the Words

I grew up playing the drums – and I loved it!  As a teenager of the 1980’s in mid-west America I played all types of rock (classic, hard, glam, pop) and when I discovered fusion I was in my element.  For a few years everything, including my career aspirations, revolved around writing, playing and performing music.  In college I earned extra money by teaching drum lessons.  In these lessons one of the first exercises I did was to put on a song and ask the student to ‘feel’ the tempo and rhythm of the music.  It didn’t take long for me to see that some people have a natural ability, others have enough ability to be taught and others ….. well, they really like music.

It is an amazing thing to watch (and listen to) someone who has a natural musical ability – whether it be drums, vocals, strings, brass or woodwinds.  This person has an almost instinctive ability to ‘feel’ the music; not just hear it.  But, even those who don’t have an aptitude to play a musical instrument, most people have an appreciation for music.  The arrangement, the combination of melody, rhythm, lyric and tempo have a tendency to capture our hearts and transport us to a place that informs our emotions and inspires our thoughts.

When I think about Jesus’ instruction to consider carefully how I listen, I sometimes relate it to music.  The way my heart responds to a quality piece of music is analogous to the way my heart responds to the message of God.  Not the same, but the analogy may help us consider the process.

If I am to respond in faith to the message I hear then I must learn to allow my heart to respond – often before I allow my head to respond.   When I hear a new song, I try to allow myself to hear the entire piece without picking apart the different instruments – sometimes this is hard to do.  Even though a part of me wants to count the meter and dissect what the rhythm section are playing I have learned that my chances of appreciating a new song are stronger if my heart experiences it before I experience it with my head.

“It is with the heart you believe…”  It is within the heart music is felt and experienced.

When we hear the words of God, it is crucial that we learn to engage with our heart.  Hearing with our ‘head’ – through reason, logic and understanding – is not bad.  On the contrary, it is good; and necessary.  But, sometimes, it is limited.

Our hearts are bigger than our heads.  So, when I hear the words of God, I am learning to resist the urge to dissect the revelation with my reason just so I can place it neatly in the filing cabinet of my understanding.  On the contrary, I am learning to hear the words of God with my heart so I can respond with the faith that is quickened by my spirit.  To do this, I must learn to recognise how my heart listens to the melody and rhythm contained in the words of God.

I am learning to pay more attention to how I listen.

Hearts that Hear

How do I listen?  In what ways do I enable my heart to listen?  Or, possibly more important, how does my spirit listen?  How aware am I of the connection between my heart and my spirit so I can be more attentive to the promptings of my spirit?

We previously looked at the verse in Hebrews which said, the people did not consider the message of value because they did not combine it with faith (Hb 4.2).  This verse has several implications, but one implication is that the message we hear can actually lead us into a faith response – if we can understand how we listen.

The people did not combine faith to what they heard because they didn’t recognise the faith which came through the message they heard.  The message of God’s goodness and provision of redemption fell on deaf ears (so-to-speak) because the hearts of the people were hard (Hb 3.15).  Even though God’s words are Spirit and Life the people did not ‘hear’ because their hearts had been hardened through unbelief (Hb 3.19).

This raises a question for me.  Had their hearts not been hard, could they have responded differently?  If they had an element of unbelief, but had not yet gone fully into a hard heart, would they have responded differently?  It may be difficult to answer for that specific group of people.  But, I don’t think their descent has to be assumed as a general rule for all people.  Those people were unaware of ‘how to listen’ but I think the scenario could be different if someone had the smallest element of belief – even if it is mustard seed small.

I am convinced there is a link between belief and the response of the heart.  A heart that is sensitive to the different ways God speaks is able to listen, able to hear and able to choose to combine faith to what it hears.

What’s even more encouraging about this is that God has told us faith (belief) is not solely our responsibility.  The words of God are Spirit and Life, and when the soft heart hears the words of God, our spirit awakens to the essence and substance of God contained in the message and responds with belief.  This is, I believe, part of what happens when Paul says that faith comes by hearing (Rom 10.17).

 

Consider Carefully & Train the Senses

Giving careful consideration to how I listen is a challenge.  It’s a little bit like trying to identify how I think, or the way I choose one option over another.

In my lighter moments I think of the old Kung-Fu films I watched as a boy.  No matter what else was happening in any given film, there was always a scene in which the young apprentice was left dazed and confused by the wisdom of the Master Teacher.  Characteristically, the Master rarely explained himself to the apprentice, he merely waited until the apprentice was ready to hear the deeper pearls of wisdom.

I realise this analogy falls short on a lot of levels but there are similarities in what we’re discussing.  How we listen, how we understand the many ways we hear and perceive God, is a tool that will enable us to mature in relationship with God.

The author of Hebrews made a statement that is a little unsettling.  He told his readers that what he had to say was hard to explain because they (his readers) had become dull in their understanding (Hb 5.11).  He told them they were still in need of someone to teach them the basic elements of the word of God and went on to say they were unacquainted with the word of righteousness (Hb 5.13).

Imagine hearing that!  “Young Grasshopper, you are unfamiliar with the Word of God!  Because of your dullness, the things you must learn will be hard for you to understand.”

His statement in verse 14 is the one that has captured my attention.  “But solid food is for the mature, for those whose faculties have been trained by practice…” (NRSV).   The Greek could be literally translated ‘faculties of perception’.  Another English version (NAS) translates this by saying, ‘having their senses trained’.

Whichever translation we choose to read, the significance of this phrase reinforces that practice and training are necessary if we are to grow into maturity.  If training and practice are required, there is an implication that we may not always discern correctly when it comes to hearing the Word of righteousness.  That means there is an element of trying to identify what we sense in our heart and being willing to learn from our mistakes when we don’t get it correct.  (A further implication is that those who lead have a responsibility to support, encourage and provide safe structures for people to grow in this.)

But regardless of what anyone else does, it is my obligation to engage in this training of my senses (faculties of perception).  I do so, not because I want to be the next Master of the Christian dojo.  I do so because I want to grow into maturity and deepen my relationship with the One whom I believe.  I do so because I want to be open to any and all the ways he may choose to speak to me.

 

Hearing the Word & Receiving the Seed

As we embark on the journey of recognising the importance of WHO we believe as opposed to WHAT we believe, the principle of applying faith to what we hear is a central component.

On one hand, since we’re more focused on WHO rather than WHAT, it can sound contradictory to say that we apply faith in the message we hear.  The question could be asked, ‘Shouldn’t we apply faith in God, rather than in the message we hear from God?’  But there doesn’t need to be any contradiction in this.

When God speaks, his message reveals an aspect of his nature.  Because of who he is, his message carries his life-giving essence and the substance of his Spirit (Jn 6.63).  This could be a reason the Apostle Paul said, “Faith comes by hearing” (Rom 10.17).

I think of the process in this way. When we hear the message from God the soft heart is predisposed to recognise the life and substance of God contained within the words we hear.  With the recognition of this aspect of God’s nature, faith is stirred within our spirit which enables the heart to respond in faith.  It’s as if the words of God contain the active ingredient which causes our spirit to respond with faith.  Remember, as we’ve discussed, faith is the by-product of belief.

In a few places, Scripture describes the word of God as the ‘seed’ of God (the Greek word used here is “sperma” [1 Jn 3.9]).  In the natural systems of reproduction, the role of the seed is to fertilise the egg.  Imagine that our faith is the ‘egg’ which is fertilised by the ‘seed’ of God.  When we combine our faith with the seed of God, a deeper awareness of his nature is conceived within our hearts.

In the natural, life must be cared for and nurtured.  In the same way, we need to learn how to nurture the newly received revelation in order to integrate it into our lives and decision-making.  It’s as if the newly grasped revelation needs to develop within the womb of our soul.